Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Co. v. Purcell Safe Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Dykeman, J., entered May 17, 1913, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in consolidated actions for replevin and on an account stated, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
— On April 4, 1911, the respondent, Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Company, entered into a contract with the appellant, Purcell Safe Company, by the terms of which it appointed the latter company its exclusive selling agent, “for the sale and distribution of all of its products, now or hereafter .manufactured or handled by it (including especially constructed, contract, bank vaults, and safe deposit work) in and for the states of Oregon, Washington, and Alaska, and that portion of Idaho and Montana now in the Purcell Safe Company’s territory.” It further agreed to consign stock to the Purcell…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- North Coast Railroad v. Kraft Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
- Zindorf Construction Co. v. Western American Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901
- Herman v. PlummerWashington Supreme Court · 1898
- Van Horne v. WatrousWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- Child Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. PageWashington Supreme Court · 1902
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Dickie Manufacturing Co. v. Sound Construction & Engineering Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
- B & D LEASING CO. v. AgerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
- Jackson v. City of Walla WallaWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- State Ex Rel. Fancher v. EverettWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- Anderson v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1935
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.