Legal Opinion

Ritland v. Rowe

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1993No. 93-136PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Trieweiler

Plaintiffs Kenneth and Jennifer Ritland commenced this action to recover for damages to their cattle and their ranching operation which they allege were caused by the negligence of defendants Alfred Rowe and Merle Heitzman. The District Court for the Twelfth Judicial District in Chouteau County, granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment, on the basis that plaintiffs’ claim was barred by the statute of limitations, and dismissed plaintiffs’ complaint with prejudice. From that judgment, plaintiffs appeal. We reverse the judgment of the District Court.

The issue is whether the three-year…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Minnie v. City of RoundupMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Hughes v. ReedCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  3. Thiel v. TAURUS DRILLING LTD. 1980-IIMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Heckaman v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Knight v. City of MissoulaMontana Supreme Court · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Polar Bear Productions, Inc. v. Timex Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. Semenza v. BowmanMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Kearney v. KXLF Communications, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Royal Insurance v. RoadarmelMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Estabrook v. BadenMontana Supreme Court · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API