Legal Opinion

Heuton v. Commissioner of Public Safety

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 26, 1995No. C3-95-1129PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Appellant Pamela Sue Heuton seeks reversal of the trial court’s decision sustaining the revocation of her driver’s license under the implied consent law, Minn.Stat. § 169.123 (1994). On appeal, Heuton argues that (1) the officer lacked probable cause to invoke the implied consent law, and (2) the Commissioner did not prove that Heuton was incapable of refusing the blood test. We affirm.

FACTS

On September 21,1994, Daniel Kuhl heard the screech of tires and a horn while he was working in his garden. Because the horn continued to blow, Kuhl went to investigate. He discovered…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. State v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Holtz v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1983
  4. Tyler v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  5. State, Department of Public Safety v. WiehleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Groe v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  2. State v. CarverCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  3. State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  4. State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  5. State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API