Legal Opinion
Groe v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 27, 2000No. C4-99-1665PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge
Appellant’s driver’s license was revoked pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 169.123, subd. 4(e) (1998) and the district court sustained the revocation. Appellant challenges the district court’s decision, arguing that the police did not have probable cause to believe he was driving under the influence of alcohol, and that his right to counsel was not vindicated. Because (1) the police had probable cause to invoke the implied consent law and (2) it was impossible for appellant to invoke his right to counsel, we affirm.
FACTS
On March 10, 1999, appellant Kirt Groe was…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Friedman v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- Prideaux v. State Dept. of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- State v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lies v. Director, North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Wetzel v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Mell v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- Friedberg v. Chubb & Son, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2011
- Magnuson v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.