Unique Industries, Inc. v. 965207 Alberta Ltd.
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
Granting the Defendant’s Motion to Strike and Resolving the Parties’ Cross-Motions for Claim ConstruoTION
I. INTRODUCTION
The plaintiff commenced this action seeking a declaratory judgment that its products do not infringe on two design patents held by the defendant. The defendant subsequently asserted counterclaims alleging patent infringement. The matter is now before the court on the defendant’s motion to strike the plaintiffs affirmative defense of inequitable conduct and on the parties’ cross-motions for claim construction. The court…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Fantasy, Inc. v. FogertyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Unique Industries, Inc. v. 965207 Alberta Ltd.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Reddy v. Lowe's Companies, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
- Day v. Cornér Bank (Overseas) Ltd.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- United States Telesis Incorporated v. EndeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Unique Industries, Inc. v. 965207 Alberta Ltd.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.