Legal Opinion
Unique Industries, Inc. v. 965207 Alberta Ltd.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 17, 2011No. Civil Action 08-1095 (RMU)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Re-opening Discovery for a Period op Ninety Days; Sanctioning Plaintiff’s Counsel for Failing to Comply with the Court’s Scheduling Orders; Denying Without Prejudice the Parties’ Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment; Denying the Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Amend
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The defendant is the holder of two design patents for numerical and star-shaped sparklers, a type of firework that throws off sparks when lit. The plaintiff, a company that also produces numerical and star-shaped sparklers, commenced this action seeking a declaratory…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States ex rel. Westrick v. Second Chance Body Armor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- Garnes El v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- University of Colorado Health at Memorial Hospital v. BurwellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Ahuruonye v. Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- Cogan v. ScottDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.