Legal Opinion

Ochoa v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 2001No. 69916-0PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

The issue in this case is whether a licensed jockey who was hired to exercise a horse during a race meet is entitled to workers’ compensation benefits under RCW 51.12.010 if injured while exercising that horse. The Court of Appeals concluded the rider, as a licensed jockey, was exempt from coverage under RCW 51.12.020(7). We reverse, holding it is a person’s employment function at the time of the injury, and not the person’s licensed status, that controls whether he or she is excepted from workers’ compensation coverage.

FACTS

Richard Ochoa (Ochoa), petitioner, was a licensed jockey who was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Postema v. Pollution Control Hearings Bd.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Postema v. Pollution Control Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Clauson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Harrington v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Berry v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Shafer v. DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Shafer v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Robinson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  4. Department of Labor & Industries v. Mitchell Brothers Truck Line, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  5. Department of Labor and Industries v. Mitchell Bros. Truck Line, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API