Robinson v. Department of Labor & Industries
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSchindler, J.
¶1 For purposes of the Industrial Insurance Act (IIA), Title 51 RCW, an employment relationship exists only where (1) the employer has the right to control the employee’s physical conduct in the performance of his *418duties and (2) there is mutual consent to an employment relationship. Because substantial evidence supports the determination that Courtney Robinson was not an employee of the Seattle Seahawks when he injured his knee during an off-season minicamp tryout as a free agent, we conclude Robinson was not entitled to workers’ compensation benefits under the IIA and affirm.
FACTS
¶2 Courtney…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Cockle v. Dept. of Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Cockle v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Dennis v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Postema v. Pollution Control Hearings Bd.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
- Postema v. Pollution Control Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2000
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Azorit-Wortham v. Dep't of Lab. & Indus.Washington Supreme Court · 2025
- Coleman Turner v. Department Of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- Courtney Perez, App V. Wa State Dept Of L&i, & Digital Control, Inc., RespsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2024
- Dep't of Labor & Indus. v. RowleyWashington Supreme Court · 2016
- Dep't of Labor & Indus. v. RowleyWashington Supreme Court · 2016
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.