Legal Opinion

Harrington v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1941No. 28282PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Steinert, J. —

Jim Harrington, a workman, filed with the department of labor and industries a claim for compensation for an injury sustained by him while engaged in ' extrahazardous employment. The supervisor of industrial insurance rejected the claim upon the ground that the workman had previously been adjudged totally and permanently disabled by reason of a former injury, and had been awarded a monthly pension for the remainder of his life. Upon a rehearing, the joint board of the department entered an order reversing the action of the supervisor, and directing that the claim be allowed. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cole v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Ingram v. W. J. Rainey, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Rehberger v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Asplund Construction Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. Klippert v. Industrial Insurance DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Franks v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Clauson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Hubbard v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. McIndoe v. Department of LaborWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  5. McIndoe v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API