Legal Opinion
Weiner v. National Tinsel Mfg. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided October 24, 1941No. 7592PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAJOR, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from an order, entered December 11, 1940, awarding a preliminary injunction, enjoining the defendant from the use of the trade names “Tye-Ad-String” and “Ribbontye” in simulation of the names “Print-Ad-String” and “Ribbonette” by which plaintiffs’ similar products were known and designated. In compliance with the order, plaintiffs gave bond in the sum of $5,000 to protect the defendant from all damages and costs which might be adjudged against the plaintiffs by reason of any wrongful or improvident issue of the injunction.
The injunction was predicated…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Armstrong Paint & Varnish Works v. Nu-Enamel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Standard Paint Co. v. Trinidad Asphalt Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Alabama v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Selchow & Righter Co. v. Western Printing & Lithographing Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
- Detroit Motor Appliance Co. v. BurkeDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ross-Whitney Corp. v. Smith Kline & French LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. Free Sewing MacHine Co. And Apsco Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
- Brooks Bros. v. Brooks Clothing of California, Ltd.District Court, S.D. California · 1945
- Congress of Racial Equality v. DouglasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Mytinger & Casselberry, Inc. v. Numanna Laboratories Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.