Legal Opinion

Alabama v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 8, 1929No. 166PublishedCited by 106 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sutherland

This suit was brought by appellants to set aside an order. of the Interstate Commerce Commission establishing intrastate rates on fertilizers and fertilizing material in Alabama; and. to enjoin numerous railroad companies from making such rates effective. The ground, of the Com-mission’s order was that the maintenance of' such-intrastate rates on a lower basis than those found reasonable would result in unjiist discrimination against, and undue prejudice to persons and localities in, interstate commerce.

The order of the'Commission is within its general powers, Houston & Texas Ry. v. United…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Virginian Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Houston, East & West Texas Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Wisconsin RR Comm. v. C., B. & QRR CO.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Meccano, Ltd. v. John Wanamaker, NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. Chicago Great Western Railway Co. v. KendallSupreme Court of the United States · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by106 opinions

  1. University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Blackwelder Furniture Company of Statesville, Inc. v. Seilig Manufacturing Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
  4. Gibbs v. BuckSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Florida v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API