Legal Opinion
Detroit Motor Appliance Co. v. Burke
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided January 6, 1925PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOOTH, District Judge.
The above-entitled cause came regularly on, and was duly heard and submitted upon bill, answer, and proof. The suit is for an injunction and for an accounting, for damages and profits on account of alleged infringement of United States patent No. 1,114,246, to F.. N. Furber, entitled “temperature controlling apparatus for internal combustion engines.”
The patent was issued October 20, 1914; application filed March 31, 1914. Plaintiff became the owner of said patent by mesne assignments from the inventor. One of the purposes or aims of the alleged invention is stated in…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Expanded Metal Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Hobbs v. BeachSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Imhaeuser v. BuerkSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Richard C. Price v. Dale R. SymsekCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Ric-Wil Co. v. E. B. Kaiser Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
- Tropic-Aire, Inc. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
- Frank Adam Electric Co. v. Colt's Patent Fire Arms Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
- Stoody Co. v. Mills Alloys, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.