Legal Opinion

State v. Dale

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 29, 1924No. 24,039PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Defendant was found guilty of grand larceny in the second degree, and appeals from the order denying a new trial.

The indictment charged that in the daytime defendant from the till in the office of a filling station, stole $54, lawful money of the United States, the property of one N. C. Harber. The chief contention is that guilt was not established by sufficient legal proof. It appears that on the southeast corner of a block in the *456city of Fairmont, there is one of the modern gasolene filling stations, operated by N. C. Harber. The building is set back from the corner and fronts a wide…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bartley v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  2. State v. PriceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  3. State v. CurtisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. JordanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  2. State v. MarkusonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  3. Wall v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API