State v. Price
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Defendant and Charles D. Etchison were indicted by the grand jury for the crime of mnrder in the first degree. Defendant demanded a separate trial, which was granted, and he was tried in the district conrfifor Hennepin county before Eish, J., and a jury which found him guilty as charged in the indictment. Erom an order denying his motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtSchaller, J.
Defendant and Charles D. Etchison were indicted by the grand jury *161of Hennepin county for murder in the first degree for the killing of the wife of defendant, Mary Fridley Price. Price’s separate trial resulted in a verdict of guilty of the crime charged. He appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
There is evidence in the record sufficient, to warrant the jury in finding the following facts: Mary Fridley Price died on November 28, 1914, from a wound received by her on that day. The cause of death was a crushing of the left side of the skull, from which injury she died within a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- State v. LawlorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- State v. DurnamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- State v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- State v. WilliamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. SweeneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Fridley v. Farmers & Mechanics Savings BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- State v. CoxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.