Legal Opinion

Wall v. F. W. Woolworth Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided May 26, 1925PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Sampson-

-Affirming.

Appellant, Nannie Wall, entered the store of the Woolworth Company, of Newport, for the purpose of-purchasing a clothes line. The -counter at which this article was sold was located at the rear of the store. The line was on a spool that -hung overhead and near the end of the counter. A young saleslady was in attendance. The line was entangled -on the spool and the saleslady was having difficulty in getting it loosened.

Appellant, Mrs. Wall, attempted to aid the saleslady in untangling the line and to do so stepped around the end of the counter…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Indian Refining Co. v. MobleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  2. Menteer v. Scalzo Fruit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  3. Bales v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  4. State v. DaleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Lyle v. MegerleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  2. Nelson v. F. W. Woolworth & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  3. Park Circuit Realty Co. v. Ringo's GuardianCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  4. Mathias v. Denver Union Terminal Railway CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
  5. Thompson v. Beard and Gabelman, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1950

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API