Legal Opinion
In Re Anonymous Member of the South Carolina Bar
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided April 25, 2011No. 26964PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
In this attorney discipline matter, the Hearing Panel (the Panel) determined Respondent was subject to discipline for violating Rule 7(a)(5), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, and Rule 8.4(e), RPC, Rule 407, SCACR, both of which provide that a lawyer may be disciplined for engaging in conduct tending to pollute the administration of justice or bring the legal profes sion into disrepute, and Rule 7(a)(6), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, which provides it is a ground for discipline for an attorney to violate the attorney’s oath of office. A majority of the Panel concluded Respondent’s action warranted an…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gentile v. State Bar of Nev.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- In Re SnyderSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- In Re SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Curtis v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- South Carolina Department of Social Services v. Michelle G.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
- Hawkins v. South Carolina Commission on Lawyer Conduct, TheDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2022