Legal Opinion

Soos v. SUPERIOR CT. COUNTY OF MARICOPA

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 8, 1994No. 1 CA-SA 94-0068PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CLABORNE, Presiding Judge.

This is a Petition for Special Action from the trial court’s order declaring the surrogate parentage contracts statute unconstitutional and ordering an evidentiary hearing to determine which person would be the better “mother” for the triplets. Petitioner Ronald A. Soos (“the Father”) contends that the trial court erred as a matter of law in holding the statute unconstitutional and that she exceeded her jurisdiction and legal authority. We disagree and find that the statute violates the Equal Protection Clause of the United States and Arizona Constitutions. We…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Skinner v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. WilliamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Carey v. Population Services InternationalSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Standhardt v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  2. Raftopol v. RameySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  3. Coyote Publishing, Inc. v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. J.B. v. M.B.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  5. In Re Roberto D.B.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API