West Bloomfield Charter Township v. Karchon
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, P.J.
This case arises from plaintiffs enforcement of its woodlands ordinance and defendants’ constitutional challenge to that ordinance and its subsequently amended version. The parties recognize that both the original and the amended ordinances are at issue in this case. The trial court granted defendants’ motion for summary disposition on the basis that the ordinances were unconstitutionally vague, overbroad, and lacking in defi nite standards. Plaintiff appeals as of right from that order. We affirm.
Concerned about the depletion of the township’s forested areas, plaintiff adopted a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Keystone Bituminous Coal Assn. v. DeBenedictisSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Hodel v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Jerry Lee Staley v. Kurt JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- People v. WhiteMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
- Indenbaum v. Michigan Board of MedicineMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
- Landon Holdings, Inc v. Grattan TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- Sanchez v. LagoudakisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.