Legal Opinion

Haas v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 19, 1992No. 76767PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

597 So.2d 770 (1992)

Carl Andrew HAAS, Petitioner,

v.

STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 76767.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 19, 1992.

Rehearing Denied May 28, 1992.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender and Daniel J. Schafer, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for petitioner.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Richard E. Doran, Asst. Deputy Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for respondent.

GRIMES, Justice.

We review Haas v. State, 567 So.2d 966 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990), in which the court certified to be of great public importance the question of whether a blood-alcohol level test result must be related back to…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Concurrence.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State v. TischioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  2. People v. MertzNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Desmond v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Davis v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1989
  5. State v. KubikNebraska Supreme Court · 1990

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Mata v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
  2. Garcia v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
  3. Dannie Carl Pattison v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
  4. State v. BaldwinNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Sereika v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1998

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API