Legal Opinion

State v. Grindles

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1989No. 13322PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

LUM, C.J.

Appellant Clifton B. Grindles appeals from his conviction of Driving Under the Influence of Intoxicating Liquor (DUI) in violation of Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 291-4(a)(l). Appellant claims that the district court erred in “bifurcating” the trial into separate hearings on the two methods of committing DUI described in § 291^4(a). We agree and therefore reverse the DUI conviction and remand for a new trial. Appellant also appeals his conviction of Disregarding a Traffic Control Signal in violation of HRS § 291C-32(a)(2)(A) on the grounds that (1) he was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lisenba v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Brooks v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. State v. FrancoWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Commonwealth v. HernandezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. State v. CuevasHawaii Supreme Court · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. State v. KelekolioHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. KupauHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. SchroederHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. McGriffHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. AlstonHawaii Supreme Court · 1994

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API