Legal Opinion

Union Pacific Railroad v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 4, 1960No. 98PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, along with other railroads, has for years engaged in the “roller lumber traffic” by performing intentionally delayed service in the transportation of lumber from the West Coast to market. Six roads so engaged have filed tariffs covering such services at the same rate as their fast freight, and the Interstate Commerce Commission now has such tariffs under investigation and consideration. Appellant, however, has refused to file a tariff covering such service but continues to handle roller lumber traffic on the same tariff as its fast freight.

The United States, at the instance of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Turner, Dennis & Lowry Lumber Co. v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mccleneghan v. Union Stock Yards Co. Of OmahaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
  2. James D. Hodgson, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Crotty Brothers Dallas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1968
  4. McClenegman v. Union Stock Yards Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
  5. Rardin Grain Co. v. Illinois Central RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API