Legal Opinion
James D. Hodgson, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Crotty Brothers Dallas, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided October 19, 1971No. 28616PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILKEY, Circuit Judge:
This appeal is taken by the Secretary of Labor from a judgment of the District Court that the Crotty Bros. Dallas (Crotty) food service operation at St. Stephen’s School is exempt from the overtime and minimum wage provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act 1 because it is a “retail establishment” within the meaning of § 13(a) (2) (1961) and § 13(a) (2) (1966) of the Act. Finding that the result reached by the District Court was correct, we affirm.
I. The Relationship Between the School and Crotty
Since 1955 appellee Crotty has, pursuant to written contract, operated the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Arnold v. Ben Kanowsky, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- A. H. Phillips, Inc. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Mitchell v. Kentucky Finance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Idaho Sheet Metal Works, Inc. v. WirtzSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Roland Electrical Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- F. Ray Marshall, Etc. v. The New Hampshire Jockey Club, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
- Lee v. Thermal Engineering Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
- Office of Communication of the United Church of Christ v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Hodgson v. ARA Services, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1975
- Hodgson v. Brand Names, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.