United States v. Florent La Haye
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Florent La Haye appeals from a judgment of conviction imposed for violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7206(2). 1 The primary question presented is whether the true owner of a winning ticket at the horse races has willfully procured or assisted in the presentation of a false return in contravention of § 7206(2) when he arranges for another person (a so-called “ten percenter”) to cash his ticket for him, giving the other person’s name and address instead of the winner’s on the required Information Return, Form 1099.
The leading case in the area is United States v. Haimowitz, 404 F.2d 38…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. CarrollSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. Stanley Haimowitz and Murray LichtmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- United States v. GisehaltzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- United States v. BlumbergDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1966
- United States v. Joseph A. RizzoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. William R. HooksCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- United States v. John A. Gambone, Sr. A/K/A Jack John A. Gambone, Sr., United States of America v. Anthony Gambone A/K/A Tony Anthony GamboneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- United States v. FumoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- United States v. GamboneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003