Legal Opinion
United States v. Fumo
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 26, 2007No. Criminal Action 06-319PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum and Order
YOHN, District Judge.
Presently before the court is a motion filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12(b) by Pennsylvania State Senator Vincent J. Fumo to dismiss various counts of the superseding indictment.
A superseding indictment (“the indictment”) was filed on February 6, 2007, charging defendants Fumo, Ruth Arnao, Leonard Luchko, and Mark Eister. Senator Fumo was charged in connection with four categories of wrongdoing: (1) fraud and conspiracy to commit fraud related to the Senate of Pennsylvania (“Senate”); (2) fraud and conspiracy to commit fraud,…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Museum of Fine Arts, Boston v. Seger-ThomschitzCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- United States v. KernellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- State v. HoltonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- United States v. StevensDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
- United States v. BryantDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.