Legal Opinion

United States v. Joseph A. Rizzo

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 17, 1971No. 19125_1PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

This appeal is from a June 3, 1970, district court order, 313 F.Supp. 734, denying a Motion for Judgment of Acquittal, which was taken under advisement and was determined after the jury had been discharged due to its inability to reach a verdict, in a criminal prosecution for violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7206 (2) - 1 After careful consideration, we have concluded that the above order of June 3, 1970, is not a “final decision” 2 under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 for the reasons stated in Gilmore v. United States, 264 F.2d 44 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 994, 79 S.Ct. 1126, 3 L.Ed.2d…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Berman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. McCoy Gilmore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  3. United States v. SwidlerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
  4. United States v. RizzoDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1970
  5. Richard A. Mack v. United States of America, Thurman A. Whiteside v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. CahalaneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  2. United States v. Hashagen, Clinton CharlesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  3. United States v. Vernon W. MathewsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
  4. United States v. CahalaneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  5. United States v. Paul J. DumaineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API