Legal Opinion
United States v. Gisehaltz
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 17, 1967No. 66 Cr. 218PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CANNELLA, District Judge.
MEMORANDUM
This case was tried non-jury, upon the application of the defendants and the consent of the U. S. Attorney.
The indictment comprised 13 counts and charges a conspiracy together with 12 substantive counts in violation of the Internal Revenue Law. 1
There was no serious question during the trial as to the appropriate law either as to the conspiracy or as to the subtantive counts. The question was in essence the credibility of the witnesses. The defendants Gisehaltz and Schwartz took the stand, Missone did not. The court drew no inference of guilt from the…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Volvo North America Corporation, International Merchandising Corporation, and Proserv, Inc. v. Men's International Professional Tennis Council, M. Marshall Happer, Iii, and Philippe Chatrier, Men's International Professional Tennis Council and M. Marshall Happer, Iii, Counterclaimants v. Volvo North America Corporation, International Merchandising Corporation, and Proserv, Inc., Counterclaim-Defendants v. Donald L. Dell, Raymond S. Benton, Dell, Benton & Falk, Mark H. McCormack International Merchandising Group, International Management Inc., Transworld International Inc., and A.B. Volvo, Additional Counterclaim-DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Darryl ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- Volvo North America Corp. v. Men's International Professional Tennis CouncilDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Lizarbe v. RondonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2009
- United States v. Archie J. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.