Legal Opinion
Dixon v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided June 19, 2013No. A146338PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNakamoto, J.
Petitioner is serving a life sentence for one count of aggravated murder, ORS 163.105. The trial court imposed a 30-year minimum sentence without the possibility of parole or work release and a 20-year minimum period before petitioner could seek parole review. He now seeks review of a decision by the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (the board) denying his request to change the terms of his confinement to a 30-year term. The board concluded that petitioner failed to carry his burden of proving that he was likely to be rehabilitated within a reasonable period of time. Petitioner…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Drew v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- Castro v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Ayres v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Salosha, Inc. v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Weems v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Washington v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- Wille v. Board of Parole & Post-Prision SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- Cascade in Home Care, LLC v. Hooks (In re Comp. of Hooks)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- King v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- Aikens v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.