Legal Opinion
State of Ohio v. Crofters
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided November 9, 1981No. Civ. 72-138PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN AND DUNN & BRADSTREET
CARL B. RUBIN, Chief Judge.
This case is currently before the Court on a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by defendant Arthur Andersen and joined in by defendant Dunn & Bradstreet.
PERTINENT FACTS
In April of 1970, King Resources Company (hereinafter “KRC”) executed a promissory note in which it promised to repay Plaintiff, the State of Ohio, $3,000,000 in two years at the rate of 9V2%. The note was unsecured. In May of 1970 KRC executed another note in which it promised to pay Plaintiff $5,000,000 in…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. FormanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. National Securities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- William Butler Smith v. Leman HudsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. DanielSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kirkland v. EF Hutton and Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1983
- Payable Accounting Corp. v. McKinleyUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- Developer's Mortgage Co. v. TransOhio Savings BankDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1989
- Roark v. Belvedere, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1985
- Smith v. Oppenheimer and Co., Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.