Legal Opinion

Payable Accounting Corp. v. McKinley

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1983No. 17589PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Justice:

This appeal is from a summary judgment in which the district court held that two contracts offered by Payable Accounting Corporation to clients and.to investors are not securities as defined by the Utah Uniform Securities Act, U.C.A., 1953, § 61-1-13(12). We reverse.

The facts are not in dispute. Payable Accounting Corporation (PAC) serves commercial enterprises by managing their accounts payable and payrolls. To subscribe to this service, the enterprises are required to sign an agreement called a “client contract.” Among other things, the contract provides that:(1) Each month…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. FormanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Tcherepnin v. KnightSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Securities & Exchange Commission v. C. M. Joiner Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,748 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Glenn W. Turner Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Merrill v. Abbott (In Re Independent Clearing House Co.)District Court, D. Utah · 1987
  2. All Seasons Resorts, Inc. v. AbramsNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Bradford v. MoenchDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1987
  4. Bradford v. MoenchDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1992
  5. Technomedical Labs, Inc. v. Utah Securities DivisionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API