Legal Opinion
Smith v. Oppenheimer and Co., Inc.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided September 20, 1985No. G83-948 CA7PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON MOTION TO DISMISS
MILES, Chief Judge.
Now before this Court is the motion of defendants Oppenheimer and Co. (“Oppenheimer”), Wright, Hunziker, Hayes, and O’Donnell to strike and dismiss certain sec tions of the complaint filed by plaintiff Smith. The complaint in this action originally alleged seven counts, which included claims against the defendants based upon violations of federal securities laws; the federal Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968; Michigan securities laws; the Michigan Consumer Protection Act; common-law fraud;…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Aaron v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Michael E. Moss v. Morgan Stanley Inc., E. Jacques Courtois, Jr., Adrian Antoniu, and James M. Newman, Morgan Stanley Inc. And James M. NewmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Richardson Greenshields Securities, Inc. v. Mui-Hin LauDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Robinson v. Kidder, Peabody and Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1987