Citizens' Bank v. Corkings
South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from circuit court, Sanborn county. Hon. Frank B. Smith, Judge. Attachment. From an order granting intervener’s motion to discharge the attachment, plaintiff appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtFuller, J.
Upon the motion of Oscar Mohr, an intervener in this action, and creditor subsequently attaching, the court made and entered an order dissolving a prior attachment levied by plaintiff, the Citizens’ Bank, upon the property of the defendant, Corkings, and from said order vacating its attachment plaintiff appeals.
The property over which this contention arises was seized by appellant on the 9th day of December, 1895, and by respond*615ent, who levied, subject thereto, just one week thereafter. Without a specific recital of facts, we shall regardfully consider, so far as essential to a determination…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Allen v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
- Cummings v. . MorrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- Proprietors of the Mexican Mill v. Yellow Jacket Silver Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1868
- Wetmore v. . HegemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Sims, Harrison & Co. v. Jacobson & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1874
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Sprint Communications Co. v. APCC Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Bottum v. HerrSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
- State Ex Rel. Freebourn v. Merchants' Credit Service, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1937
- J. F. Anderson Lumber Co. v. National Surety Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
- Siever v. Klots Throwing Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1926
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.