Legal Opinion
Former Employees of Joy Technologies, Inc. v. United States Secretary of Labor
United States Court of International Trade
Decided October 31, 2007No. Slip Op. 07-160; Court 06-00088PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALLACH, Judge.
I
INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the Court on consideration of the United States Department of Labor’s (“Labor”) third remand results denying Plaintiffs, Former Employees of Joy Technologies (“FEO Joy”), certification for Trade Adjustment Assistance (“TAA”). Plaintiffs seek review of Labor’s determination in Joy Technologies, Inc.; DBA Joy Mining Machinery; MT. Vernon Plant, MT. Vernon, IL; Notice of Negative Determination on Remand, 72 Fed.Reg. 1,771 (January 16, 2007), C.R. at 429 (“Remand Results ”). As set forth below, the Remand Results are not supported by…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Local 167, International Molders & Allied Workers' Union ex rel. Group of Aggrieved Workers v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Former Employees of Hawkins Oil & Gas, Inc. v. U.S. Secretary of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993
- Former Employees of Linden Apparel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
- Former Employees of Swiss Industrial Abrasives v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Former Employees of Invista, S.A.R.L. v. U.S. Secretary of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010