Legal Opinion

Grigsby v. L. & E. Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 11, 1913PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Perry Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Response to Petition eor, Rehearing by

Judge Lasting.

The opinion in this ease will be found in 150 Ky., 557.

In its petition for rehearing, counsel for appellee raise ia question not presented in the loiwer court or in this court, on appeal. They now insist that the statute under consideration (section 2492, Kentucky Statutes) gives a lien for labor, material, supplies, and teams, only to those who have contracts with the owners and to those who make contracts with the immediate contractor; and that no one, who- works for, or furnishes supplies, material, and- teams to, a contractor to whom a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Richmond & I. Const. Co. v. Richmond, N., I. & B. R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
  2. Hightower v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1900
  3. Central Trust Co. v. Richmond, N., I. & B. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky · 1892
  4. Grigsbey v. Lexington & Eastern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Arcweld Manufacturing Co. v. BurneyWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Newport Benevolent Burial Ass'n v. ClayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  3. Woodson Bend, Inc. v. Masters' Supply, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1978
  4. Republic Supply Co. v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  5. E. I. DuPont de Nemours Powder Co. v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API