Legal Opinion

Markovich v. Schlafke

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1939PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNeeson, J.

The only errors assigned on this appeal are: (1) That the trial court erred in denying defendants’ motion for judgment in their favor notwithstanding the verdict, and (2) that the trial court erred in refusing to grant their motion to change the answer to the fifth question of the special verdict, which related to the assumption of risk, from “No” to “Yes,” and for judgment in their favor upon the verdict as so changed. Both assignments of error involve the same contention. That contention is that the accident *641was caused by the defendant’s going tO' sleep while operating his automobile and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Walker v. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Knipfer v. ShawWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Krantz v. KrantzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Scory v. LaFaveWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Young v. Nunn, Bush & Weldon Shoe Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Schrader v. KrieselSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  2. Bogen v. . BogenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Bogen v. BogenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Hubenette v. OstbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  5. Davis v. HollowellMichigan Supreme Court · 1950

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API