Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Foreman v. Chapman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 18, 1923No. 14310PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcNEILL, J.

Susie Foreman, a minor, by her next friend commenced this action to recover possession of certain land in Pontotoc county and for cancellation of certain guardianship proceedings, wherein her guardian sold (he land through the county court of Pontotoc county.. On the same day Vina Harris filed her action in said court upon two causes of action to recover possession' of certain land, and for cancellation of guardianship proceedings wherein the guardian of her deceased son, Claude Foreman, had 'sold the land of Claude Foreman while he was a minor.

The defendants rued answers and cross-petition,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hathaway v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Tucker v. LeonardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Jackson v. CarrollSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  4. Wortham v. JohnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  5. Stangair v. RoadsWashington Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Johnson v. FurchtbarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Cummings v. InmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. McNaughton v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Gallaghar v. PetreeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. L. E. Myers Co. v. RossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API