Legal Opinion

Cummings v. Inman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 18, 1926No. 16275PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RAY, O.

This suit is by a full-blood Creek Indian brought, after reaching her majority, for cancellation of her guardian’s deed executed during her minority, for possession, and to quiet title, upon the ground that the sale was in violation of the statutes, and therefore void. William N. Inman and wife, defendants in possession, deraigned title by deed from the purchaser at the guardian's sale. The defendants Atlantic Petroleum Company and Burk-Hoffield Oil Company claimed leasehold Interests in the land under oil and gas mining leases from Inman and wife. From an adverse judgment,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Abraham v. HomerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Hathaway v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Eaves v. MullenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Daly v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Greer v. McNealSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Meshek v. CordesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  2. Filtsch v. SipeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  3. Billingsley v. NorthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  4. Brown v. State Nat. Bank of ShawneeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  5. Dryden v. BurkhartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API