Fossett v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.
The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was charged under a city ordinance, in the municipal court of Oklahoma City, with the offense of vagrancy, was convicted and sentenced to pay a fine of $19 and costs amounting to $1. _ Within ten days she filed an appeal bond, and the record was properly sent to the county court. The case came on for hearing in the county court, and upon motion of the municipal counselor the appeal was there dismissed, for the reason that no written notice or demand had been given by defendant in the court below. The record was properly preserved, and the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- City of Sapulpa v. LandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Oklahoma News Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Walton, Mayor v. DonnellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Owen v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Lackey v. State Ex Rel. GrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- City and County of Denver v. StateSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Voss v. Lundvall Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- City of Tulsa v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
- American Home Fire Assur. Co. of New York v. Mid-West Enterprise Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
- City of Tulsa v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.