Nugent v. Teachout
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Mecosta. (Fuller, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
It appears from the evidence on behalf of the plaintiff in this case that, on the eighteenth day of December, 1884, James Nugent and wife deeded to the defendant 40 acres of land in the township of Barton, in Newaygo county. The expressed and actual consideration for this deed was $1,000. It was to be paid for as follows: Defendant was to pay a mortgage upon the premises of $700, and convey to plaintiff an acre of land, upon which there was a house, in Cadillac. There was another mortgage of $50 upon the land deeded to defendant by Nugent, and also $40 back upon the Cadillac property, both of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Goodwin v. GilbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1813
- Whitbeck v. WhitbeckNew York Supreme Court · 1828
- Phippen v. MorehouseMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Elder v. HoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1865
- Nelson v. SwanNew York Supreme Court · 1816
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Michigan Aero Club v. ShelleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Dikeman v. ArnoldMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Murphy v. McGrawMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Davis v. GerberMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Applebaum v. GoldmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.