Legal Opinion

State v. Romanko

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 18, 2012No. AC 33357PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The defendant, Todd R. Romanko, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or drugs or both in violation of General Statutes § 14-227a (a) (l).1 The defendant claims that (1) the court’s jury instructions (a) improperly enlarged the scope of the charge against him and (b) deprived him of his constitutional right to a unanimous verdict, and (2) the court violated his constitutional right to present a defense when it did not allow him to introduce certain demonstrative evidence. We…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. KitchensSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  2. State v. ShabazzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  3. Barry v. Quality Steel Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  4. State v. WatsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  5. State v. THOMAS W.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. RomankoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API