Cotton v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
*350Opinion of the Court by
Judge Clarke
Affirming.
Appellant complains of his conviction of illegally possessing a moonshine still, because of the 'alleged admission of incompetent evidence and insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict.
Officers searched his house, barn and outbuildings under a confessedly defective search warrant, and the court refused to permit them to testify as to what, if anything, they found therein.
But after sc doing, the officers proceeded, either by the public road or directly through an intervening field, to a cedar thicket located on defendant’s farm, about 600…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brent v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
- Childers v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
- Keith v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
- Royce v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
- Ingram v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. GeorgeWyoming Supreme Court · 1926
- Reynolds v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
- Wolf v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Richardson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
- Simmons v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.