Legal Opinion · Dissent

Beaver Products Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 21, 1930No. 3233Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION

Hatfield, Judge:

I am unable to concur in the views expressed in the majority opinion.

The solution of the problem presented by the appeal depends upon a proper construction of section 489 and other sections of the act pari materia.

It appears from the record that appellant imported certain pulp-board from Canada and entered it at the foreign value. It was appraised at the entered value plus a Canadian sales tax of 5 per centum.

The importer — appellant—appealed to reappraisement.

While this appeal was pending in the United States Customs Court, appellant, • during the period…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Zinberg v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. Mills v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
  3. Ciba Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API