Legal Opinion

Hirshbach v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 29, 1914No. 1201PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 32291 (T. D. 33409).

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge

The merchandise is truly described in the evidence and in the opinion of the board as paper leaves of various colors. It was assessed for duty under paragraph 438 of the tariff act of 1909, the relevant portion of which relates to—

Artificial or ornamental feathers, fruits, grains, leaves, flowers, and stems or parts thereof, of whatever material composed, not specially provided for in this section.

This assessment was upheld by the Board of General Appraisers.

The importers in this court claim that the merchandise is properly dutiable under paragraph 415 of the same act, the relevant part of…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  2. De Waubert, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  3. Morimura Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
  4. Louis Weinberg Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  5. Anglo-American Commodities v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API