Legal Opinion

Anglo-American Commodities v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 10, 1953No. 57673; protest 143607-K (New York)Published

1Opinion of the Court

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This case relates to brooches and earrings, composed of bone china, which were classified as jewelry in chief value of artificial flowers under paragraph 1527 (a) (2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the trade agreement with Mexico, T. D. 50797, and assessed with duty at 60 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1518 of the Tariff Act of 1930. Plaintiff claims that the articles are properly classifiable under the provision in paragraph 1527 (a) (2), as amended by said T. D. 50797, for “Jewelry, commonly or commercially so known, finished or unfinished (including…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bayersdorfer v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  2. Hirshbach v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  3. Tuska, Son & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API