Legal Opinion

Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 9, 1961No. C.D. 2289PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wilson, Judge:

The merchandise in the case at bar consists of certain iron wall ornaments, which were assessed with duty at 35 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1518 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Protocol of Terms of Accession by Japan to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T.D. 53865, supplemented by T.D. 53877, as articles in chief value of artificial leaves and stems, chief value of other materials, not specially provided for.

Plaintiff claims the merchandise properly dutiable at the rate of 20 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cochran Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
  2. Bayersdorfer v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  3. Hirshbach v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  4. Morimura Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
  5. Protests 939597-G of BarrantUnited States Customs Court · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Alpine Importers of Calif. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  2. Henry A. Wess, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  3. Moore International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  4. A. Simkins, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  5. Abraham v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API