Legal Opinion

De Waubert, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided January 5, 1956No. C. D. 1747PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wilson, Judge:

The merchandise involved in this case consists of certain earthenware ornaments and was assessed for duty by the collector at 45 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1518 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the President’s proclamation supplementing the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 51898, as artificial flowers, composed wholly or in chief value of materials other than “yarn, threads,” etc.

Plaintiffs claim that the involved importation does not consist of artificial flowers in the tariff sense and that it is properly dutiable at 5 cents per dozen pieces…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cochran Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
  2. Bullocks, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1944
  3. Hirshbach v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  4. United States v. American Bead Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
  5. M. Pressner & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bergdorf Goodman Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  2. Anglo American Commodities v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  3. Field v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  4. Jacobson v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  5. Shaland v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API