Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Deutsch Larrimore Farnish & Anderson, LLP

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 6, 2005PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.

¶ 1 This is an appeal from the order of the trial court granting appellees’ preliminary objections and dismissing appellant’s complaint with prejudice. We affirm.

¶ 2 Appellant is an orthopedic surgeon and appellees are attorneys and law firms who represent plaintiffs in workers’ compensation cases. In October of 2003, appellant was an expert witness for a defendant in an unrelated action brought by appellees on behalf of their client. In the course of appellant’s deposition in that matter, appellees cross-examined appellant about his 1997 arrest for assault and possession of an instrument of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. County of Allegheny v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Pro Golf Manufacturing, Inc. v. Tribune Review Newspaper Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Mellon Bank, N.A. v. FabinyiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Willet v. Pennsylvania Medical Catastrophe Loss FundSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Mistick, Inc. v. Northwestern National Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In the Interest of A.B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Foxworth v. Pennsylvania State PoliceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Taha v. Bucks CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Taha v. Bucks County PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. FOP Lodge No. 5 v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API