Pro Golf Manufacturing, Inc. v. Tribune Review Newspaper Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHIEF JUSTICE ZAPPALA.
This appeal presents an issue of first impression: whether an action for commercial disparagement is governed by the one-year statute of limitations set forth in 42 Pa.C.S. § 5523(1), 1 or the two-year statute of limitations set forth in 42 Pa.C.S. § 5524(7). 2 The Superior Court determined that the two-year limitations period found in Section 5524(7) applied. For the reasons that follow, we reverse and hold that the one-year limitations period found in Section 5523(1) governs an action for commercial disparagement.
Appellee, Pro Golf Manufacturing, Incorporated,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Time, Inc. v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Agriss v. Roadway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. v. CastegnaroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Triester v. 191 Tenants Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- McGuire v. ShubertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Jennifer Clemens v. Execupharm IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
- Bro-Tech Corp. v. Thermax, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Giordano v. ClaudioDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Boring v. Google Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Johnson v. AnhornDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.