Legal Opinion

Julius Rappaport, A/K/A Jerome Hirsh v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 22, 1977No. 76-2157PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

The district court filed a memorandum decision concluding with “Defendant’s mo tion for summary judgment is granted.” On a printed form customarily used in the Northern District of Illinois to record motions presented, appearances thereon, and dispositions thereof, the same sentence was inserted, We understand this form is ordinarily referred to as a “minute order.” The minute order was reflected in a docket entry as follows: “Enter order dated September 21, 1976: Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted, (draft) Grady, J.”

Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal from “the District Court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. IndrelunasSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Home Federal Savings and Loan Association of Chicago v. Republic Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
  3. Aurora Gazmin Navarro v. District Director of the United States Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Burger King Corporation v. The Horn & Hardart CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  2. Zinovy v. Reytblatt v. Harold B. DentonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  3. Foremost Sales Promotions, Inc. v. Director, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  4. Alpine State Bank v. Ohio Casualty Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  5. Louisiana World Exposition, Inc. v. LogueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API