Legal Opinion
Foremost Sales Promotions, Inc. v. Director, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, Defendants
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 27, 1987No. 86-2809PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Per curiam
Foremost, the plaintiff, asked for an injunction and a declaratory judgment proclaiming its right to continue in the liquor business. Both sides moved for summary judgment. The district judge wrote an opinion that would support some relief for Foremost, but he left the extent of relief open, 642 F.Supp. 1025. He denied its request for an injunction “at this time”, stated that he need not decide whether Foremost is an agent of its franchisees, and concluded: “The court declares that the Foremost enterprise does not violate 27 U.S.C. § 205(b) or (c) because it does not exclude sales by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. WetzelSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bankers Trust Co. v. MallisSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Qaid Rafeeq Azeez and Abdullah Muhammad v. James W. Fairman, Warden, John E. Wright, Asst. Warden, and A. Dodge, 120 (c.o.)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Robert L. Glidden v. Chromalloy American Corporation and Allied Products CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Josephine Kaszuk v. Bakery and Confectionery Union and Industry International Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Arlene Otis v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Garcia v. VilsackCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Burger King Corporation v. The Horn & Hardart CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Estate of Herbert CammonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Bethune Plaza, Inc. v. LumpkinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.