Legal Opinion
Burger King Corporation v. The Horn & Hardart Company
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 19, 1990No. 223, 224, Dockets 89-7440, 89-7558PublishedCited by 111 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MESKILL, Circuit Judge:
These appeals require us to consider the propriety of the district court’s disposition by summary judgment of a question of contract interpretation. Plaintiff Burger King Corporation (Burger King) appeals from two judgments entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Knapp, /., denying Burger King’s motion for summary judgment and granting defendant Horn & Har-dart Company’s (Horn & Hardart) cross-motion for summary judgment. Each party sought in its motion a declaration regarding the term of certain franchises. Horn & Hardart is a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Breed v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Chimart Associates v. PaulNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Schering Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Home Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Leonhard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by111 opinions
- Banque Arabe et Internationale D'Investissement v. Maryland National BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Brass v. American Film Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- United States v. John Frank RodgersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Frank A. Galli, Una G. Galli, John D. Yeager, Elizabeth M. Yeager v. James T. Metz, Jr., Kathleen M. MetzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Richard G. Allen v. Adage, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.